It no secret that Mette Frederiksen and the social democrats has had som awful polling date this year and Ive been very critical on her and the very ambitious nature which is the reason she has gotten horrible polling data. But I wanna talk abit about the party I voted for, who has been the winner in the same polls beccause of their very cleaver tactic to critique Mette Frederiksen but without alienating the voter base who cant see themselves in the Democratic party.

But I wanna speculate if this tactic of “soft” critique is short therm based and if it can be relatively easily reversed? Here is my view or take on it, the success for the : Socialist people party, who I voted for and who likes to be called The greens internationally, has had success mostly because of the doings of the current government which is a mix of 1 red block party and 2 blue (right winged), the government is very unstable and the polling data has been abysmal even for the social democratic party, because of their actions which by enlarge is very authoritarianism because they had a small majority rule which is seldom in Denmark but do happen from time to time but they have been very poor in there politics and the only reason they are still standing is because we have had a good financial years which they had very little to do with but unlike rest of europa them we are doing well.

Now I fear that because the critique in general has been soft in order to give people the option to move from the Social democratic party to the one I voted for the socialist party, but I fear there is a risk it can be reversed since the success has not been because of something we did but rather because of horrible decisions from Mette Frederiksen like removing a holiday or making reforms on educations and ofc giving tax breaks to the rich just so Mette could stay in power as the chosen state minister. This obvious grab for power no matter the cost has been Mette Frederiksen mo (modus operandi) but it has lead her down a very unpopular path which is why the party I boted for is having success, but I fear if the Social Democrats will try and re brand it self once Mette Frederiksen has finally found her job in higher place that fits her ambition ( internationally i bet) but because she is the face of the low polling data then perhaps when she leaves people will be tempted to rejoin the Social Democratic party.

If this happens then perhaps the political strategy should have been to make some political positions that would differ the two parties and would force people to make a choice in a way between the two parties ensuring that people will have a harder time thinking about going back to the Social Democrats, this would be my tactic on the short term but only if it turns out that the success to the Socialist people party can be easily reversed with a new head figure and some rebranding then perhaps we should have opted for a stronger positioning and also found something that would make the divide between the 2 parties bigger and thus forcing the people leaving Mette Frederiksen to take upon positions against her and the party.

I hope im wrong and that the polling date success for the party I voted on will translate to actual political Success beyound the short term and even mid term period, but if that fails then perhaps my idea of a stronger “break” or “divide” should have been persued but the risk is that perhaps the Social Democrats would be able to feel they can move away from the left and perhaps takes a stronger leap to the right and we lose overall in the red block, so it’s not easy and many women loves Mette Frederikern also, I often see them in media talking about wanting the “old” mette or wanting a new mette and I guess her recent hairdo is part of the small cult following she clearly has but im not impressed.

Keep the flame for truth burning and remember your Seatbelts! Stay Safe! No fate…